Caulobase

Pathways

Molecular pathways

The cell-cycle circuit on the network page decides when things happen. These modules are the machinery it drives: they move the chromosome, choose where the cell divides, and build the flagellum, pili, stalk and holdfast. Step through each one, or select any part to see its evidence.

Chromosome segregation: ParABS, PopZ, TipN

After replication starts at the polar origin, the ParB-bound parS centromere beside the origin is moved to the opposite (new) pole by the ParA ATPase. TipN and PopZ keep transport directional, PopZ captures and anchors the arriving ori–ParB complex, and SMC loaded at parS aligns the chromosome arms.

The interactive diagram needs JavaScript; the parts and interactions are listed below.

Parts and interactions, with evidence
FromInteractionToNoteEvidence
ParBbindsparSParB binds DNA sequences adjacent to the origin (parS)Mohl & Gober 1997; Toro et al. 2008
ori (Cori)precedesOrigin translocationThe 8-kb region holding ori and parS is what moves rapidly to the opposite poleToro et al. 2008
Replication initiationprecedesOrigin translocationOn initiation the ori/parS region moves to the far pole; segregation waits until parS is replicatedToro et al. 2008; Jensen & Shapiro 1999
ParBinhibitsParAParB binds and destabilizes ParA structures; ParA retracts on contact with ParBPtacin et al. 2010; Shebelut et al. 2010
ParAactivatesOrigin translocationParA ATPase drives partition-complex transport; an ATPase mutant halts segregationToro et al. 2008; Ptacin et al. 2010; Lim et al. 2014
TipNbindsParATipN interacts with ParA at the new pole, keeping transport directionalSchofield et al. 2010; Ptacin et al. 2010
PopZbindsParBPopZ binds ParB directly and tethers the ori–ParB complex at the poleBowman et al. 2008; Ebersbach et al. 2008
PopZrecruitsParAReleased ParA is recruited into the polar PopZ structure, enforcing pole-directed transportPtacin et al. 2014
ParAactivatesPopZA local rise in ParA promotes PopZ matrix assembly at the new pole (unipolar to bipolar)Laloux & Jacobs-Wagner 2013
MreBlocalizes / scaffoldsPopZPolar PopZ accumulation by diffusion/capture requires the MreB cytoskeletonBowman et al. 2008
MreBactivatesOrigin translocationOne replicated origin moves to the opposite end in an MreB-dependent mannerThanbichler & Shapiro 2006
ParBrecruitsSMCSMC is recruited to parS and its arm-alignment activity depends on ParBTran et al. 2017
SMCactivatesOrdered chromosome layoutSMC promotes colinearity of the chromosome arms; smc null cells mislocalize ori/terLe et al. 2013; Tran et al. 2017; Jensen & Shapiro 1999
ZitPlocalizes / scaffoldsPopZZitP binds PopZ and regulates the localization of PopZ and ParBBergé et al. 2016
ParBrecruitsMipZHand-off: MipZ forms a complex with ParB near ori and moves with it to the polesThanbichler & Shapiro 2006
Origin translocationprecedesOrdered chromosome layoutNewly replicated loci follow the origin in chronological order to their final positionsViollier et al. 2004

Division-site selection and the divisome

MipZ, carried to both poles by ParB, forms bipolar gradients that block FtsZ polymerization near the poles, so the Z-ring assembles at midcell where MipZ is lowest. FtsZ then recruits FzlA, FzlC and later divisome proteins (FtsA, FtsN, FtsW/FtsI, DipM) that constrict and separate the envelope.

The interactive diagram needs JavaScript; the parts and interactions are listed below.

Parts and interactions, with evidence
FromInteractionToNoteEvidence
ParBrecruitsMipZPolar ParB complexes bind MipZ and stimulate formation of ATP-bound MipZ dimersThanbichler & Shapiro 2006; Kiekebusch et al. 2012
MipZbindsNucleoid DNAATP-MipZ dimers bind chromosomal DNA near poles; ATP hydrolysis releases diffusible monomersKiekebusch et al. 2012
MipZinhibitsFtsZMipZ blocks FtsZ polymerization: sequesters monomers and caps (+) ends of FtsZ polymersThanbichler & Shapiro 2006; Corrales-Guerrero et al. 2022
FtsZprecedesZ-ringFtsZ ring forms at midcell, the region of lowest MipZ concentrationThanbichler & Shapiro 2006
CtrArepresses transcriptionFtsZCtrA binds a site overlapping the ftsZ start site and represses it in swarmer cellsKelly et al. 1998
KidOinhibitsFtsZKidO acts directly on FtsZ to tune cytokinesis with the cell cycleRadhakrishnan et al. 2010
FzlAbindsZ-ringFzlA binds and curves FtsZ filaments; FzlA–FtsZ structures resist MipZ depolymerizationGoley et al. 2010; Lariviere et al. 2018
FzlCbindsZ-ringFzlC binds membranes and recruits FtsZ to them via the FtsZ C-terminal peptideMeier et al. 2016
Z-ringprecedesFtsAFtsA arrives after Z-ring formation, early FtsZ-binders and PG-remodelling proteinsGoley et al. 2011; Meier et al. 2016
FzlAactivatesFtsW / FtsIFzlA links FtsZ to activation and spatial orientation of the septal synthases FtsW/FtsILariviere et al. 2019
FtsNrecruitsDipMDipM is recruited to the constriction site through interaction with FtsNMöll et al. 2010
Z-ringrecruitsDipMDipM localizes to the division site FtsZ-dependently via its PG-binding LysM domainsGoley et al. 2010; Poggio et al. 2010
FtsW / FtsIactivatesConstriction & separationSeptal PG synthesis by FtsW/FtsI drives constriction; FzlA needed for proper rateLariviere et al. 2019
DipMactivatesConstriction & separationDipM remodels septal PG; without it outer-membrane invagination and separation are delayedMöll et al. 2010; Goley et al. 2010
Crescentin (CreS)activatesCell curvatureCrescentin filament creates a sidewall elongation-rate gradient that curves the cellAusmees et al. 2003; Cabeen et al. 2009

Flagellar hierarchy, ejection and chemotaxis

Flagellar genes form a four-tier hierarchy: CtrA activates class II genes (MS ring, switch, export, FlbD), whose assembled products license FlbD/σ54-dependent class III and IV transcription, and hook completion licenses flagellin translation (FlaF vs FlbT). The flagellum is built at the TipN/TipF-marked new pole, ejected in a PleD-dependent way at the swarmer-to-stalked transition, and a CtrA-dependent chemotaxis operon builds a polar receptor array.

The interactive diagram needs JavaScript; the parts and interactions are listed below.

Parts and interactions, with evidence
FromInteractionToNoteEvidence
CtrAactivates transcriptionClass II genesCtrA controls flagellar promoters; ChIP shows CtrA at the class II fliF promoterQuon et al. 1996; Laub et al. 2002; Davis & Viollier 2011
CtrAactivates transcriptionMajor che operonThe major chemotaxis operon requires CtrA but not RpoN or class II genesJones et al. 2001
TipNlocalizes / scaffoldsTipFTipF relies on TipN for positioning at the new poleHuitema et al. 2006
TipFrecruitsClass II genesActivated TipF recruits flagellar switch proteins and PflI at the TipN-marked poleDavis et al. 2013
Class II genesprecedesClass III genesAssembly of MS ring, switch and export apparatus is required for class III transcriptionMangan et al. 1999; Anderson & Newton 1997
FliXinhibitsFlbDFliX binds FlbD and represses it when the class II structure is missingMuir & Gober 2004
FlbDactivates transcriptionClass III genesFlbD activates σ54 promoters of class III genes via ftr enhancer elementsRamakrishnan & Newton 1990; Wu et al. 1995
σ54 (RpoN)activates transcriptionClass III genesσ54 is required for level III transcription and recognizes the flbG promoterAnderson et al. 1995; Brun & Shapiro 1992
FlbDactivates transcriptionClass IV flagellinsFlbD also activates σ54-dependent class IV promoters, incl. flagellin operonsRamakrishnan & Newton 1990; Wu et al. 1995
Class III genesprecedesClass IV flagellinsBasal body–hook completion is the checkpoint for flagellin translationAnderson & Newton 1997; Llewellyn et al. 2005
FlbTrepressesClass IV flagellinsFlbT binds the fljK 5' UTR, inhibiting translation and destabilizing the mRNAAnderson & Gober 2000; Mangan et al. 1999
FlaFactivatesClass IV flagellinsFlaF is required for fljK translation; FlbT and FlaF act in oppositionLlewellyn et al. 2005
Class II genesprecedesPolar flagellumFliF is inserted at the incipient swarmer pole where it initiates flagellar assemblyJenal & Shapiro 1996
Class IV flagellinsprecedesPolar flagellumThe filament assembles from six flagellins; no single one is strictly requiredFaulds-Pain et al. 2011
PleDactivatesFlagellum ejectionpleD is required for efficient FliF removal and ejection of the flagellumAldridge & Jenal 1999
Polar flagellumprecedesFlagellum ejectionFliF is proteolysed at swarmer→stalked differentiation, coinciding with flagellum lossJenal & Shapiro 1996; Aldridge & Jenal 1999
Major che operonsynthesizesChemoreceptor arrayThe che operon expresses mcpA; McpA localizes to the flagellated poleJones et al. 2001; Alley et al. 1992
Chemoreceptor arraylocalizes / scaffoldsPolar flagellumThe receptor array lies tens of nm from the flagellar motor it controlsBriegel et al. 2008

Pili, holdfast and surface adhesion

Swarmer cells carry Tad (Cpa) pili and make the polysaccharide holdfast at the new pole. Pilin expression needs CtrA and PleC, and PodJ positions the pilus and holdfast machinery; surface contact sensed through pilus retraction and the flagellar motor triggers c-di-GMP-dependent holdfast synthesis via HfsJ, which HfiA inhibits.

The interactive diagram needs JavaScript; the parts and interactions are listed below.

Parts and interactions, with evidence
FromInteractionToNoteEvidence
CtrAactivates transcriptionPilA (pilA)pilA promoter is activated late in the cell cycle under CtrA controlSkerker & Shapiro 2000
PleCactivatesPilA (pilA)PleC activity controls accumulation of the PilA pilin subunitViollier et al. 2002; Viollier et al. 2002
PodJlocalizes / scaffoldsPleCPodJ provides positional information for polar localization of PleCViollier et al. 2002; Hinz et al. 2003
PodJlocalizes / scaffoldscpa genesPodJ is required for polar localization of the pilus assembly factor CpaEViollier et al. 2002
PleClocalizes / scaffoldscpa genesPleC activity drives the asymmetric distribution of CpaE to one poleViollier et al. 2002
PilA (pilA)precedesTad piliTimed pilin transcription controls when pili are assembledSkerker & Shapiro 2000
cpa genessynthesizesTad piliCluster encodes pilus assembly proteins; CpaC/CpaE are polar before filament polymerizationSkerker & Shapiro 2000; Viollier et al. 2002
Tad piliactivatesHoldfastResistance to pilus retraction is sufficient to stimulate holdfast synthesisEllison et al. 2017; Sangermani et al. 2019
Surface contactactivatesDgcBSurface-induced motor interference stimulates c-di-GMP production by DgcBHug et al. 2017
DgcBsynthesizesc-di-GMPDgcB synthesizes c-di-GMP in the tactile responseHug et al. 2017
c-di-GMPactivatesHfsJc-di-GMP allosterically activates HfsJ for rapid holdfast synthesisHug et al. 2017
c-di-GMPactivatesTad piliIntermediate c-di-GMP boosts pilus activity; peak levels drive pilus retractionSangermani et al. 2019
HfiAinhibitsHfsJHfiA directly targets the glycosyltransferase HfsJFiebig et al. 2014
HfsJsynthesizesHoldfastHfsJ is required for holdfast productionFiebig et al. 2014; Hug et al. 2017
hfs genessynthesizesHoldfasthfsDAB mutants make no holdfast; hfsG/hfsH are needed for synthesisSmith et al. 2003; Toh et al. 2008
HfaA/B/D anchorbindsHoldfastHfaA/HfaB/HfaD form a complex anchoring the holdfast to the cellHardy et al. 2010
PodJlocalizes / scaffoldsHfaA/B/D anchorPolar Hfa localization requires PodJ and holdfast secretion proteinsHardy et al. 2010
PleDactivatesHoldfastHoldfast formation timing in swarmer cells depends on PleDLevi & Jenal 2006
Flagellumactivates transcriptionHfiAhfiA transcription falls in flagellar mutants (PleD-modulated), so they make holdfast earlyBerne et al. 2018; Hershey et al. 2019

c-di-GMP oscillation and its outputs

c-di-GMP is low in G1 swarmer cells and rises at the G1→S transition, when the phosphodiesterase PdeA is degraded and the cyclases DgcB and PleD (activated by DivJ-dependent phosphorylation) act. The rising signal drives ShkA–TacA transcription, binds PopA and CckA to clear CtrA and allow replication, and activates TipF and HfsJ for polar morphogenesis.

The interactive diagram needs JavaScript; the parts and interactions are listed below.

Parts and interactions, with evidence
FromInteractionToNoteEvidence
DivJphosphorylatesPleDDivJ positively controls the in vivo phosphorylation of PleDAldridge et al. 2003
PleCinhibitsPleDPleC modulates PleD phosphorylation negativelyAldridge et al. 2003
PleDsynthesizesc-di-GMPPhosphorylated PleD dimerizes, localizes to the pole and synthesizes c-di-GMPPaul et al. 2004; Paul et al. 2007
DgcBsynthesizesc-di-GMPUnopposed DgcB activity, with PleD, upshifts c-di-GMP at G1→SAbel et al. 2011
PdeAhydrolyzesc-di-GMPPdeA's EAL domain hydrolyses c-di-GMP to pGpG; it antagonizes DgcB until G1→SChristen et al. 2005; Abel et al. 2011
CpdRpromotes degradationPdeACpdR delivers PdeA to the ClpXP protease at the G1→S transitionAbel et al. 2011
c-di-GMPactivatesShkAc-di-GMP binds the ShkA pseudo-receiver domain and stimulates the kinaseKaczmarczyk et al. 2020
ShkAphosphotransferTacAPhosphorelay ShkA→ShpA→TacA phosphorylates and activates TacABiondi et al. 2006; Kaczmarczyk et al. 2020
TacAactivates transcriptionPolar developmentTacA with σ54 activates stalk genes in a G1/S-specific programBiondi et al. 2006; Kaczmarczyk et al. 2020
c-di-GMPbindsPopAc-di-GMP binding to PopA's GGDEF domain targets PopA to the cell poleDuerig et al. 2009; Ozaki et al. 2014
PopApromotes degradationCtrAPolar PopA recruits CtrA via RcdA to the old pole for ClpXP proteolysisDuerig et al. 2009; Ozaki et al. 2014
c-di-GMPinhibitsCckAc-di-GMP binds CckA, inhibiting its kinase and stimulating its phosphatase activityLori et al. 2015
c-di-GMPactivatesTipFRising c-di-GMP activates, stabilizes and polarizes TipFDavis et al. 2013
c-di-GMPbindsDgrADgrA is a PilZ-type c-di-GMP receptor controlling flagellar motor functionChristen et al. 2007
c-di-GMPactivatesHfsJc-di-GMP allosterically activates the holdfast glycosyltransferase HfsJHug et al. 2017
PleDactivatesPolar developmentPleD GGDEF signalling is needed for FliF degradation, flagellum ejection and stalk formationAldridge & Jenal 1999; Aldridge et al. 2003
  • DivJ protein — Hand-off from core module: stalked-pole histidine kinase that positively controls PleD phosphorylation. Aldridge et al. 2003
  • PleC protein — Hand-off from core module: swarmer-pole histidine kinase that negatively modulates PleD phosphorylation. Aldridge et al. 2003
  • PleD protein — Response regulator with GGDEF output; phosphorylation-driven dimerization activates c-di-GMP synthesis and polar localization. Hecht & Newton 1995; Paul et al. 2004; Paul et al. 2007
  • DgcB protein — Diguanylate cyclase held in check by PdeA until G1→S; also a motor-associated surface sensor. Abel et al. 2011; Hug et al. 2017
  • PdeA protein — GGDEF–EAL c-di-GMP phosphodiesterase (CC3396) activated by GTP; degraded by ClpXP via CpdR at G1→S. Christen et al. 2005; Abel et al. 2011
  • CpdR protein — Hand-off from core module: response regulator that delivers PdeA to ClpXP in a phosphorylation-dependent way. Abel et al. 2011
  • ShkA protein — Hybrid histidine kinase stimulated by c-di-GMP binding its pseudo-receiver; relays via ShpA to TacA; later proteolysed. Kaczmarczyk et al. 2020; Biondi et al. 2006
  • TacA protein — σ54-dependent activator driving the G1/S-specific transcription program for morphogenesis and S-phase entry. Kaczmarczyk et al. 2020; Biondi et al. 2006
  • PopA protein — PleD paralogue turned c-di-GMP effector; c-di-GMP targets it to the old pole, where it links to RcdA. Duerig et al. 2009; Ozaki et al. 2014
  • CckA protein — Hand-off to core phosphorelay: essential kinase that c-di-GMP binding switches from kinase to phosphatase mode. Lori et al. 2015
  • CtrA protein — Hand-off to core module: replication inhibitor degraded by ClpXP at the old pole at G1→S. Duerig et al. 2009; Abel et al. 2011
  • TipF protein — Degenerate-EAL c-di-GMP receptor; activated, stabilized and polarized as c-di-GMP rises to nucleate the flagellum. Davis et al. 2013
  • DgrA protein — PilZ-domain c-di-GMP receptor; high c-di-GMP or DgrA blocks motility by interfering with motor function. Christen et al. 2007
  • HfsJ protein — Hand-off to pili-holdfast module: holdfast glycosyltransferase allosterically activated by c-di-GMP. Hug et al. 2017
  • c-di-GMP small-molecule — Cyclic di-GMP; oscillates over the cycle (low in G1, upshift at G1→S) and is distributed asymmetrically at division. Abel et al. 2013; Christen et al. 2010; Lori et al. 2015
  • Polar development process — Swarmer→stalked pole remodelling: flagellum ejection and stalk biogenesis. Aldridge & Jenal 1999; Aldridge et al. 2003; Biondi et al. 2006

Stress responses: GSR, SOS and starvation

The general stress response is a partner switch: stress kinases pass phosphate through MrrA and PhyK to PhyR, whose σ-like domain then sequesters the anti-σ NepR and frees σT. DNA damage delays division via SOS-induced SidA and SOS-independent DidA, while starvation and proteotoxic stress arrest the cycle through (p)ppGpp and Lon-dependent loss of DnaA.

The interactive diagram needs JavaScript; the parts and interactions are listed below.

Parts and interactions, with evidence
FromInteractionToNoteEvidence
MrrAphosphotransferPhyKPhyK accepts phosphoryl groups from MrrALori et al. 2018
PhyKphosphotransferPhyRPhyK passes phosphate on to PhyR; PhyR phosphorylation is PhyK-dependent in vivoLori et al. 2018; Lourenço et al. 2011
MrrAphosphotransferLovK–LovRMrrA also transfers phosphate to LovKLori et al. 2018
LovK–LovRrepressesPhyRLovK–LovR controls PhyR phosphorylation, draining phosphate away from the PhyK–PhyR branchForeman et al. 2012; Lori et al. 2018
PhyRbindsNepRPhospho-PhyR's σ-like domain binds the anti-σ NepR (partner switch)Herrou et al. 2010; Herrou et al. 2012; Lourenço et al. 2011
NepRinhibitsσT (EcfG)NepR directly binds σT and negatively regulates its functionLourenço et al. 2011
σT (EcfG)activates transcriptionσT regulonσT directly controls most of its regulon, induced e.g. by osmotic stressAlvarez-Martinez et al. 2007; Lourenço et al. 2011
σT (EcfG)repressesCtrASigT mediates the carbon starvation-induced degradation of CtrABritos et al. 2011
DNA damageinhibitsLexADamage-induced LexA cleavage releases repression of SOS genesModell et al. 2014
LexArepresses transcriptionSidAsidA belongs to the LexA-regulated SOS regulonModell et al. 2011; da Rocha et al. 2008
DNA damageactivates transcriptionDidAdidA is induced by DNA damage independently of SOS, via DriDModell et al. 2014
DNA damageinhibitsCtrADNA damage coordinately induces the SOS regulon and inhibits CtrAModell et al. 2011
SidAinhibitsFtsW / FtsNSidA binds FtsW directly, preventing final constrictionModell et al. 2011
DidAinhibitsFtsW / FtsNDidA binds FtsN to block cytokinesis without disrupting divisome assemblyModell et al. 2014
SpoTsynthesizes(p)ppGppSpoT synthesizes (p)ppGpp in response to carbon or nitrogen starvationLesley & Shapiro 2008; Boutte & Crosson 2011; Ronneau et al. 2016
(p)ppGpppromotes degradationDnaASpoT/(p)ppGpp is required for starvation-triggered DnaA proteolysis in swarmer cellsLesley & Shapiro 2008
(p)ppGppstabilizes (protects from degradation)CtrAppGpp/polyP keep CtrA in starved swarmers; mutants degrade CtrA and start replicationBoutte et al. 2012
LondegradesDnaALon directly degrades DnaA; proteotoxic stress induces and activates LonJonas et al. 2013; Leslie et al. 2015

Stalk biogenesis and specialization

The stalk is a thin extension of all envelope layers grown at the old pole after flagellum ejection. PopZ recruits SpmX, which recruits DivJ; bactofilins recruit the PG synthase PbpC, which anchors the stalk protein StpX, and diffusion barriers compartmentalize the stalk. PleD and ShkA–TacA/σ54 promote stalk growth; phosphate limitation lengthens it via Pst/PhoB.

The interactive diagram needs JavaScript; the parts and interactions are listed below.

Parts and interactions, with evidence
FromInteractionToNoteEvidence
PopZrecruitsSpmXPopZ directly recruits SpmX to the developing stalked polePerez et al. 2017
SpmXrecruitsDivJLocalized SpmX recruits and stimulates the DivJ kinaseRadhakrishnan et al. 2008; Perez et al. 2017
PopZactivatesStalkPopZ affects polar stalk morphogenesisEbersbach et al. 2008
PleDactivatesStalkpleD loss cuts stalk formation to ~25% of cells; constitutive PleD doubles stalk lengthAldridge & Jenal 1999; Aldridge et al. 2003
ShkAphosphotransferShpAPhosphotransfer profiling places ShpA downstream of the hybrid kinase ShkABiondi et al. 2006
ShpAphosphotransferTacAShpA phosphorylates and thereby activates TacA in vivoBiondi et al. 2006
TacAactivates transcriptionStaRTacA activates its regulon, which includes staRBiondi et al. 2006
σ54 (RpoN)activates transcriptionStaRTacA collaborates with σ54 to activate stalk gene expressionBiondi et al. 2006
StaRactivatesStalkstaR regulates stalk lengthBiondi et al. 2006
BacA / BacBrecruitsPbpCBactofilin polymerization and membrane binding are needed to recruit PbpC to the stalked poleKühn et al. 2010; Liu et al. 2025
PbpCsynthesizesStalkBactofilin-localized PG synthase acts at the stalked pole during stalk synthesisKühn et al. 2010; Hughes et al. 2013
PbpClocalizes / scaffoldsStpXPbpC anchors StpX to rigid outer-membrane components of the elongating stalkHughes et al. 2013
StpXlocalizes / scaffoldsStalkStpX is sequestered in the stalk (dispersed in stalkless mutants) and modulates elongationHughes et al. 2010
Stalk diffusion barrierslocalizes / scaffoldsStalkBarrier complexes prevent membrane and soluble protein exchange between stalk and bodySchlimpert et al. 2012
PstSCABrepressesPhoBpst mutants make long stalks even in high phosphate, and this requires phoBGonin et al. 2000
PhoBactivates transcriptionPstSCABpstS transcription depends on phoBGonin et al. 2000
PhoBactivatesStalkPhoB is required for stalk elongation in response to phosphate starvationGonin et al. 2000